First, people don't have 20/20 hindsight, so saying whether a decision is "wrong" based on an outcome is not really what we're discussing here (at least I don't think so). I'm just looking at the decision from the point of one's personal values and not knowing the future (nobody does, so it's pointless). No one knows whether his friend would die or not. ('Sides, if you're talking about knowing outcomes, how about knowing what type of "friend" Long really turned out to be as well...)Originally Posted by bliss
Given that, I'm not a believer in changing/making decisions based on every single time someone threatens suicide. (Not saying his friend threatened suicide, but you get the gist of it). Of course, every situation is different. But given what LXH knew at the time, no, I wouldn't do what he did. People need to take responsibility for their own actions. I would explain the situation between me and my girl to Long. If he can't handle it and goes off and dies, I'd feel bad but not guilty. It was his decision to make.
Maybe martyr was too strong a word to use, but I didn't say he was trying to gain sympathy. Fine. He certainly gets none from me.Originally Posted by ChronoReverse
No, he didn't actually drag her over and "give" her to Long. But to me, his attitude and actions tells me that was how his mindset worked. He purposely treated her badly, inflicting emotional damage on a loved one and being phony at the same time. The fact that he did this to get her to be w. his friend, showed that he thinks she was his to give (or control/influence). Such ego! In my opinion, *just* removing himself from the equation, and respecting her as an individual, means getting the issue out in the open (not much of a communicator, is he?) and letting her choose. Of course, she wouldn't choose Long, so he felt he had to take matters into his own hands.Originally Posted by ChronoReverse