Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Can Yeung Hong really be blamed for killing Au Yeung Hak?

  1. #1
    Moderator Ken Cheng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    24,369

    Default Can Yeung Hong really be blamed for killing Au Yeung Hak?

    Of all the terrible things that Yeung Hong had done, it was his killing of Au Yeung Hak that condemned him to death. Had he not killed Au Yeung Hak, he would not have feared West Poison Au Yeung Fung's finding out about it, and hence probably would not have stricken Wong Yung's poisoned soft body armor out of panic.

    Still, of Yeung Hong's various crimes, the killing of Au Yeung Hak didn't seem to be such a terrible one. For starters, Au Yeung Hak was no saint himself. Had Yeung Hong not killed him, it's likely that Gwok Jing and Wong Yung probably would have at some point in LOCH (in fact, Wong Yung almost did with that boulder). More importantly, Au Yeung Hak had just tried to rape Yeung Hong's wife, Muk Lim Chi. In modern law today, if a man kills another man in a fit of rage after seeing that other man violating his wife, the killer is punished, but comparatively mildly. In most U.S. jurisdictions, for example, such killers are usually charged with only second degree murder or even voluntary manslaughter...and generally don't get the death penalty or life imprisonment (perhaps ten to twenty years in prison). The reason being that this crime, while inexcusable, is understandable enough to mitigate the punishment. Furthermore, Yeung Hong was a prince. I do believe that in most kingdoms, the penalty for attempting to rape a spouse of a prince would be death. Whatever else wrong Yeung Hong might have done, I think he was well within his rights (ethically and legally) to kill Au Yeung Hak at that point.

    Not that this mattered at all to Au Yeung Fung, of course, and Yeung Hong did have other ulterior motives (i.e. becoming the heir to the White Camel Mountain martial arts legacy of West Poison) beyond merely avenging Au Yeung Hak's offense towards his wife, but it's ironic that the one "evil" act that Yeung Hong tried desperately to keep secret and that ultimately killed him was one that wasn't really that evil at all.

  2. #2
    Banned Ken Tran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Cheng
    Not that this mattered at all to Au Yeung Fung of course, and Yeung Hong did have other ulterior motives (i.e. becoming the heir to the White Camel Mountain martial arts legacy of West Poison) beyond merely avenging Au Yeung Hak's offense towards his wife, but it's ironic that the one "evil" act that Yeung Hong tried desperately to keep secret and that ultimately killed him was one that wasn't really that evil at all.
    It was poetic justice for YH to be killed for an act he had commited that wasn't really that evil at all. I wouldn't blame YH, though, because he was just trying to protect his wife from harm's way.
    Last edited by Ken Tran; 06-11-06 at 08:23 PM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member yittz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,943

    Default

    Lies. His main motive was to be OYF's disciple. All this bs about MRC...he could have just said I want this one (MRC) when offered by OYK between MRC and Sun Bu Er's disciple. OYK was in no way threatening YK, and YK could have easily dispersed the threat to MRC, by either choosing her, or just say that's his gf. But no YK choose to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. The intention was evil, the outcome was good in that in got YK killed , which is beneficial to everyone (inc. YG and MRC).

    OYK isn't that bad. Would you say he's worse than YK? Yes, he's a player etc etc..., his female disciples have commented that they want to please him and don't appear to be depressed.

    After OYK's legs were broken, GJ is unlikely to have the urge to kill him.

Similar Threads

  1. Yeung Hong and Au Yeung Hak: were they buddies?
    By Ken Cheng in forum Wuxia Fiction
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-13-11, 02:54 AM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-03-10, 12:10 PM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-18-09, 04:20 PM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-02-08, 05:13 PM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-06-07, 02:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •