+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 57 of 57

Thread: Which TVB adaption of Jinyong novels are most accurate?

  1. #41
    Junior Member Apop Harris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    24

    Default

    I think it depends of how you define "accurate".
    It could be accurate plot and dialogues that stay true to the novel,
    or accurate on characters' description.

    For example LOCH 2003 is the most accurate plot between all the LOCH adaptation.
    But the characters cast = the most inaccurate, in my opinion.
    You saw Hong Qi Gong is too old and skinny there, but Hong Qi Gong in the novel is a little bit chubby (because he loved food!) and not too old.

    Huang Rong in the novel was described as a petite 16 year old, long hair over her shoulder, and you can read that she frequently giggled, poked out her tongue, very playful and bright at the beginning and grown mature as the story goes.
    But 2003's Huang Rong was too calm, too tall with hair tied up, husky, low-pitched voice far from giggly.

    LOCH 2008 obviously deviated from the novel, but for characters cast it is closer to the book than 2003.

  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    2,245

    Default

    Speaking of physically fitting the role, would you guys rather have someone physically fit a role extremely well but not be a great actor, or someone not fit the role very well physically but be a great actor?

    For some characters it's not extremely important, but for someone like Xiao Feng it's really difficult to choose since his physicality is such a critical part of who he is. I liked DGSD '96 for his heroic spirit, but he was neither big nor intimidating. From the few scenes I saw of DGSD 2000's, there was a drastic difference in aura and awe when we see him towering over the people and walking right through them.

  3. #43
    Senior Member kidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Somewhere Out There
    Posts
    13,060

    Default

    It depends on whether the physical appearance is crucial to the character and plot or not. You can't have an ugly Yang Guo or ugly Princess Fragrance. But, for someone, I'm happy that the adaptation didn't follow the book's physical appearance. In the book 'Big Time Celebrity', Yang Fan is a fat guy. But, I'm glad that they used a skinny guy to play Yang Fan in the Shaw Brother's adaptation and use Nicholas Tse to play Yang Fan in the Mainland series adaptation. In this case, the physical appearance of the character doesn't matter.
    什麼是朋友?朋友永遠是在你犯下不可原諒錯誤的時候,仍舊站在你那邊的笨蛋。~ 王亞瑟

    和諧唔係一百個人講同一番話,係一百個人有一百句唔同嘅說話,而又互相尊重 ~ - 葉梓恩

  4. #44
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apop Harris View Post
    I think it depends of how you define "accurate".
    It could be accurate plot and dialogues that stay true to the novel,
    or accurate on characters' description.

    For example LOCH 2003 is the most accurate plot between all the LOCH adaptation.
    But the characters cast = the most inaccurate, in my opinion.
    You saw Hong Qi Gong is too old and skinny there, but Hong Qi Gong in the novel is a little bit chubby (because he loved food!) and not too old.

    Huang Rong in the novel was described as a petite 16 year old, long hair over her shoulder, and you can read that she frequently giggled, poked out her tongue, very playful and bright at the beginning and grown mature as the story goes.
    But 2003's Huang Rong was too calm, too tall with hair tied up, husky, low-pitched voice far from giggly.

    LOCH 2008 obviously deviated from the novel, but for characters cast it is closer to the book than 2003.
    You think Guo Jing was accurate cast for LOCH 2008?

  5. #45
    Senior Member PJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    17,781

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tape View Post
    Speaking of physically fitting the role, would you guys rather have someone physically fit a role extremely well but not be a great actor, or someone not fit the role very well physically but be a great actor?
    I'd usually prefer great acting. Accuracy is not crucial to me. DGSD 2002 had some very faithful dialogue as per the novel, but the delivery was horrible and it felt like they were just emotionlessly reading. The show should make me care about the characters no matter what.
    TC to Ken: "You need to watch the ending of ROCH 83."

  6. #46
    Moderator Ken Cheng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    20,515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PJ View Post
    I'd usually prefer great acting. Accuracy is not crucial to me. DGSD 2002 had some very faithful dialogue as per the novel, but the delivery was horrible and it felt like they were just emotionlessly reading. The show should make me care about the characters no matter what.
    Yeah...accuracy is of limited value if you make a boring-a$$ show that nobody wants to watch. DGSD '81 wasn't even *close* to accurate to the novel for the final 1/4 of the series, but it was hella entertaining.

    Of course, a screenwriter/director can screw the pooch from both an accuracy *and* entertainment point of view: I heard that the 1990s Taiwanese ROCH adaptation with Richie Ren was neither accurate nor entertaining, unless one happens to enjoy farcically bad wuxia adaptations.

  7. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    2,245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Cheng View Post
    Yeah...accuracy is of limited value if you make a boring-a$$ show that nobody wants to watch. DGSD '81 wasn't even *close* to accurate to the novel for the final 1/4 of the series, but it was hella entertaining.

    Of course, a screenwriter/director can screw the pooch from both an accuracy *and* entertainment point of view: I heard that the 1990s Taiwanese ROCH adaptation with Richie Ren was neither accurate nor entertaining, unless one happens to enjoy farcically bad wuxia adaptations.
    it's actually not THAT bad if you've never, ever seen an adaption of ROCH before. enough stuff happens where you actually want to watch the next episode. sadly, it was the first ROCH i watched in its entirety and was old enough to understand what was going on. i caught bits and pieces of ROCH '83 as a kid, but I never understood the story.

    it's a weak defense for the show, but i always think that JY adaptations are pretty boring in general now and I wish they'd just stop making them for a decade or two and use the plethora of GL stories available

  8. #48
    Moderator Ken Cheng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    20,515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tape View Post

    it's a weak defense for the show, but i always think that JY adaptations are pretty boring in general now and I wish they'd just stop making them for a decade or two and use the plethora of GL stories available
    Yeah...Jin Yong adaptations have been overly remade during the past fifteen or so years. *How* many versions of DGSD, LOCH, ROCH, HSDS, SPW, and DOMD have we seen since 1993?

    On the other hand, there really haven't been that many Gu Long adaptations. I'm hoping TVB will give LUK SIU FUNG another shot someday.

  9. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    2,245

    Default

    I wonder why they stopped ? "The Return of Luk Siu Fung" was quite decent and kept you wondering with all the strange characters and occurrences. I thought the ending was a bit weak, but I think the whole wuxia genre (or even series as a whole!) suffers from that.

  10. #50
    Moderator Ken Cheng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    20,515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tape View Post
    I wonder why they stopped ? "The Return of Luk Siu Fung" was quite decent and kept you wondering with all the strange characters and occurrences. I thought the ending was a bit weak, but I think the whole wuxia genre (or even series as a whole!) suffers from that.
    THE RETURN OF LUK SIU FUNG's ending was a bit of a downer, but at the same time, I admired TVB's attempt to go for an out-of-left-field ending. I totally thought that it would come down to a final battle with Luk Siu Fung, Sai Mun Chui Sheut, and Fa Mun Lau (and perhaps others) ganging up to defeat Lau Wan. TVB totally didn't do that: Lau Wan basically *won* (escaped from Luk Siu Fung), but before he could celebrate his victory, all that he had worked for was destroyed by a force greater than even Lau Wan's martial arts - nature (a volcano wiped out his secret island paradise).

    It was a downer ending, but I kind of liked it.

  11. #51
    Senior Member Ian Liew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    2,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tape View Post
    I wonder why they stopped ? "The Return of Luk Siu Fung" was quite decent and kept you wondering with all the strange characters and occurrences. I thought the ending was a bit weak, but I think the whole wuxia genre (or even series as a whole!) suffers from that.
    I think TVB just decided that their actors aren't cut out for wuxia anymore, or it's too much effort when you can keep feeding the HK viewers comedies and dramas and they'll be happy. Or maybe they feel there's no point because it'll always compare unfavourably with the China productions in terms of scenery and graphics. It's a shame, because sometimes we want a good old Canto wuxia serial and it's just not available.

  12. #52
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    2,245

    Default

    Agreed.

    On a sidenote, I've never been too interested in costume design or anything like that, but I realized that I enjoyed wuxia series much more when the costumes were similar to the 80's -- bright and form fitting. The costumes from TVB ever since the mid 90's started getting baggier and baggier, with more and more layers of dreary clothing. Kills the mood for me for some reason.

  13. #53
    Moderator Ken Cheng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    20,515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tape View Post
    Agreed.

    On a sidenote, I've never been too interested in costume design or anything like that, but I realized that I enjoyed wuxia series much more when the costumes were similar to the 80's -- bright and form fitting. The costumes from TVB ever since the mid 90's started getting baggier and baggier, with more and more layers of dreary clothing. Kills the mood for me for some reason.
    Yeah...the costumes that TVB and other production companies have used since the 1990s (e.g. the baggy stuff) are actually more historically accurate, but aesthetically, they're harder on the eyes. The 1980s costumes weren't realistic, but they were much sleeker and aesthetically appealing.

  14. #54
    Senior Member Ian Liew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    2,123

    Default

    It's also quite heartbreaking to see the kelefes of the 90s wearing the clothes which the 80s leads wore. So often I saw a costume I recognised and felt so sorry at how the mighty had fallen. TVB should run an eBay session, and auction off Felix Wong's Guo Jing outfit, or Michael Miu's Chor Lau Heung outfit etc.. I'm sure they'd make a lot of money from what is basically junk to them.

  15. #55
    Moderator Ken Cheng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    20,515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Liew View Post
    It's also quite heartbreaking to see the kelefes of the 90s wearing the clothes which the 80s leads wore. So often I saw a costume I recognised and felt so sorry at how the mighty had fallen. TVB should run an eBay session, and auction off Felix Wong's Guo Jing outfit, or Michael Miu's Chor Lau Heung outfit etc.. I'm sure they'd make a lot of money from what is basically junk to them.
    Are any of the 1980s TVB wuxia outfits still in existence? I thought they were all burned to a crisp during a 1988 TVB props/costumes warehouse fire. I thought that was the main reason (other than a need to update) that all the costumes began looking different during the 1990s.

  16. #56
    Junior Member Apop Harris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goodrick View Post
    You think Guo Jing was accurate cast for LOCH 2008?
    No! Li Yapeng 2003 physical appereance is closer to Guo Jing: tall and dark with wide shoulder. Hu Ge is definitely not Guo Jing, too white and skinny and less manly. But his acting is not too bad

  17. #57
    Member Tam_Nguyen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    115

    Default

    I liked TVB LOCH 94. Julian Cheung and Athena Chu were just so perfect as Guo Jing and Huang Rong! and this version followed the novel pretty well...it was the most faithful LOCH I think!
    GeMi fan!

Similar Threads

  1. I have some Jinyong novels Questions?
    By aniking_8 in forum Wuxia Fiction
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 08-06-07, 01:13 AM
  2. Connections of Jinyong novels about Qing dynasty?
    By aniking_8 in forum Wuxia Fiction
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-26-07, 09:29 PM
  3. TVB Martial Art Film that was not from Jinyong!
    By aniking_8 in forum Wuxia Fiction
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-16-07, 11:01 PM
  4. Help numbering all the martial art in Jinyong novels!
    By aniking_8 in forum Wuxia Fiction
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-14-07, 08:11 PM
  5. Was this duel of SOD 1996 accurate to the novel?
    By Mr. Mok in forum Wuxia Fiction
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-28-04, 08:39 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts