how the **** are you going to agree to Thor's comment in the beginning, which was clearly sexist and biased, then reason yourself, and then conclude that you are aware that both genders are susceptible to spend on impractical things?!??
not once did i try to disprove by saying anything sexist like "actually, women rule the world" but instead, i've been trying to prove that women are NOT incapable of finances and how men, too, can splurge on impractical things. funny because throughout all that blabbering of yours, you somehow ended with the same position i was in all along. if you disagreed with Thor from the beginning, why did you bother replying to my "bullshit" post towards him?
and i understood your argument how women spending on handbags are equivalent to guys spending on comic books/action figures. what i questioned you was how are guys justified to put so much into their cars.. your answer? "it's practical". one minute, you are defending the practical uses of the better sound system, making it faster, etc.. AS IF investing into a car has MORE uses than a handbag. but the next minute, you are saying that cars are like handbags because they are both "passions that each gender indulge", meaning both are EQUALLY worthy. WTF?
anyways, it's a nice day out.
have the last say if you want.
and Thor have flipflopped, but one agreeing (or should i say, disagree!?) along makes him just as bad.