Originally Posted by
Ken Cheng
Words are the bread-and-butter of my profession, and if there's one thing that we both learn and teach in our business, it's that words are very precise tools and must be used with care. The careless use of words leads to misrepresentation and in some cases, even obfuscation, and these generally do not lead to effective or satisfying discussion.
I can let you slide on something such as, "the Janitor Monk is guaranteed to defeat Yeung Teet Sum," even though that isn't strictly true, because the difference between them is big enough to likely be of little consequence, but Great vs. Great in ROCH? No, I'm afraid the margins are much too close to permit that kind of carelessness with language.
It was still a mistake, though, because Yeung Gor's planned objective was not achieved with that action. As it turned out, things worked out for him anyway, but that doesn't negate the fact that it was an error.
And so it proves that Yeung Gor is human and can screw up just like the rest of them; is that really *so* bad?