Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Obai vs. Ng 3 Gwai as military commanders

  1. #1
    Moderator Ken Cheng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    24,369

    Default Obai vs. Ng 3 Gwai as military commanders

    Obai and Ng 3 Gwai separately posed the greatest threats to Emperor K'ang Hsi's reign during DOMD (and perhaps in real world history as well), and both were excellent military leaders. If the two of them were to lead equal armies against each other in equal situations (e.g. all other factors do not favor one side or the other), which man's military prowess and skill would more likely prevail?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,109

    Default

    Oboi was physically strong and politically powerful, but Wu Sangui was a very good military commander, possibly the best in China at the time. It took the combined efforts of Kang Xi's most capable subordinate generals, backed up with superior forces, to beat him, and even then they suffered early defeats which nonetheless whittled down Wu Sangui's own resources. Kang Xi's strategy was to throw his best generals backed by numbers at Wu Sangui, with the expectation that they'd lose the early battles but chip away at Wu Sangui's forces, until such a point where even Wu Sangui's genius couldn't hold out any longer.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Ace High's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pannonian View Post
    Oboi was physically strong and politically powerful, but Wu Sangui was a very good military commander, possibly the best in China at the time. It took the combined efforts of Kang Xi's most capable subordinate generals, backed up with superior forces, to beat him, and even then they suffered early defeats which nonetheless whittled down Wu Sangui's own resources. Kang Xi's strategy was to throw his best generals backed by numbers at Wu Sangui, with the expectation that they'd lose the early battles but chip away at Wu Sangui's forces, until such a point where even Wu Sangui's genius couldn't hold out any longer.
    And Oboi did feared WSG's military might. When WSG came to Beijing for Shun Zhi's funeral, Oboi imposed a lot of conditions to the former before allowing WSG to enter the Capital.
    You plant a garden and the flowers do not bloom, you poke a stick in the mud and it grows into a tree

  4. #4
    Moderator Ken Cheng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    24,369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ace High View Post
    And Oboi did feared WSG's military might. When WSG came to Beijing for Shun Zhi's funeral, Oboi imposed a lot of conditions to the former before allowing WSG to enter the Capital.
    I think Ng 3 Gwai had a larger garrison (more men and weaponry), but was he necessarily a superior military mind to Obai?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Ace High's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Cheng View Post
    I think Ng 3 Gwai had a larger garrison (more men and weaponry), but was he necessarily a superior military mind to Obai?
    Long before Oboi was captured and eventually killed, WSG has begun his military preparation in his enevitable clash against the Qing. When WXB when to Yunnan, he noted how well prepared and well trained WSG's troops compared to the Eight Banners' troops.
    You plant a garden and the flowers do not bloom, you poke a stick in the mud and it grows into a tree

  6. #6
    Senior Member charbydis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    White Camel Mountain
    Posts
    6,288

    Default

    As a Fan Wang in Yu Nan, WSG had larger troops to defend against other forces at the borders. He also had the geographic advantage of being at a safe distance from Beijing. He could plan and scheme away from the eyes of Kang Xi and probably had more freedom to train or equip his men as he pleased. Whereas Oboi was stuck in Beijing and I believe armies were not allowed to garrison within the city walls. He could not move troops easily even though he was one of the main counsellors, and his moves were watched by Kang Xi's spies because he lived so close, so he had either do everything secretly or do nothing at all.

    Futhermore, WSG probably had the support of surrended Ming commanders that were oppressed by Manchurian commanders, and gathered under WSG as a group for protection. As a military commander, WSG was probably more crafty and understood the works of the Eight Banner Troops due to previous experienced when he defended Shan Hai Pass. Oboi always gave me the impression that he was more of a man of action than of mind, relying his physical strength and political influence and underestimating the young Emperor.

    Out of the two, I back WSG as the more deadlier enemy of Qing.
    "Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self."
    Cyril Connolly

  7. #7
    Senior Member Ace High's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by charbydis View Post
    As a Fan Wang in Yu Nan, WSG had larger troops to defend against other forces at the borders. He also had the geographic advantage of being at a safe distance from Beijing. He could plan and scheme away from the eyes of Kang Xi and probably had more freedom to train or equip his men as he pleased.
    I beg to differ.

    Oboi had controlled the Imperial Court completely established a system of near absolute rule under himself. Sonin was already dead and Sukhsaha was executed. The remaining regent, Ebilun was under Oboi’s control.

    Quote Originally Posted by charbydis View Post
    Whereas Oboi was stuck in Beijing and I believe armies were not allowed to garrison within the city walls. He could not move troops easily even though he was one of the main counsellors, and his moves were watched by Kang Xi's spies because he lived so close, so he had either do everything secretly or do nothing at all.
    The Eight Banners troops were stationed at eight of the nine city gates, one gate per banner, except for the Zhengyangmen. The Bordered Yellow banner at Andingmen, the Plain Yellow banner at Deshengmen, the Plain White banner at Dongzhimen, the Bordered White banner at Chaoyangmen, the Plain Red banner at Xizhimen, the Bordered Red banner at Fuchengmen, the Plain Blue banner at Chongwenmen, and the Bordered Blue banner at Xuanwumen. Each banner had an office hall, several troop barracks, a patrol station, and a warehouse. Each banner would have at least 7,500 troops for a total of 60,000 troops.

    In addition to the Eight Banners, troops permanently encamped in and around Beijing included the Qianfengying, Hujunying, Bujun Xunbuying, Jianruiying, Huoqiying (in charge of artillery), Shenjiying (first begun in 1862), and the Huqiangying (in charge of guns).

    We can safely said that there were more than 100 thousand troops stationed in Beijing.

    Quote Originally Posted by charbydis View Post
    Futhermore, WSG probably had the support of surrended Ming commanders that were oppressed by Manchurian commanders, and gathered under WSG as a group for protection. As a military commander, WSG was probably more crafty and understood the works of the Eight Banner Troops due to previous experienced when he defended Shan Hai Pass.
    More likely the commanders who were previously under WSG continued to serve him.

    There were a lot of capable Han commanders that served directly the Qing, such as Zhang Yong, Zhao Liang Dong, Wang Jin Bao and Sun Si Ke (they really do exist, not just characters created by Jin Yong).
    You plant a garden and the flowers do not bloom, you poke a stick in the mud and it grows into a tree

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Difficult call. If I had to put money on it I would give a very slight edge to Obi, not as an individual general but because of warfare style.

    WSG was a Ming general and his most notable success pre Manchu invasion was defensive. It stands to reason his style would be infantry based with cavalry in support.

    Obi was an old school Manchu general thus would most like use the archer/armoured cavalry combo.

    History tells us in these clashes unless the infantry can trap the fast cavalry then the latter always wins. So unless WSG has a terrain advantage then Obi can run circles around him until he wins.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Ian Liew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    2,786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 426mak View Post
    WSG was a Ming general and his most notable success pre Manchu invasion was defensive. It stands to reason his style would be infantry based with cavalry in support.
    Post-Manchu invasion Wu Sangui was also very active in the campaigns against the Southern Ming Emperors. Those were battles in which he took on an attacking role, and the Southern Ming remnants lasted close to a decade in war with the Qing (under whose banner Wu Sangui fought). His army and tactics would have changed significantly since the years defending Shanhaiguan.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Liew View Post
    Post-Manchu invasion Wu Sangui was also very active in the campaigns against the Southern Ming Emperors. Those were battles in which he took on an attacking role, and the Southern Ming remnants lasted close to a decade in war with the Qing (under whose banner Wu Sangui fought). His army and tactics would have changed significantly since the years defending Shanhaiguan.
    Not necessarily. The southern campaign was against infantry based armies so traditional Ming tactics would have been sufficient.

    Also these battles were against remnants of previously defeated foes. Hardly top quality opponents that require new tactics to defeat.

    The only real threat to the Manchus at the time were the Zhengs and they were a naval force.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Ace High's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 426mak View Post
    Not necessarily. The southern campaign was against infantry based armies so traditional Ming tactics would have been sufficient.

    Also these battles were against remnants of previously defeated foes. Hardly top quality opponents that require new tactics to defeat.

    The only real threat to the Manchus at the time were the Zhengs and they were a naval force.
    You vastly underestimate the military strength of the Three Feudatories. During the Revolt of Three Feudatories, they even manage to control 8 out of the 18 provinces. Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangdong, Fujian, Hunan, Sichuan, Guangxi and Shaanxi all were under their controls. The Qing was left only with 10 provinces. Furthermore, it took the Qing more than 8 years (August 1673 – November 1681) to quell the Revolt of Three Feudatories, with the first half the Qing was in the defensive mode.

    The Zhengs wasn’t that much of a threat to the Qing. In a way, they enjoyed protection from the Three Feudatories previously as the Qing attention was focused on the Three Feudatories. After the Revolt of Three Feudatories was quelled, the Qing was able to turn their attention to Taiwan. With a single battle, which is the Battle of Penghu (1683), Taiwan’s defensive capabilities were utterly destroyed.
    You plant a garden and the flowers do not bloom, you poke a stick in the mud and it grows into a tree

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Giang Ho, Canada
    Posts
    4,876

    Default

    I know this is out of topic but I wonder whether conquering the whole China, Qinghai, Xinjiang, Mongolia and Tibet a big mistake by the Manchu? Logically, if you conquer a land with much much higher population than your, you will eventually lose in the end. If the Manchu didn't over expand themselves but stick to their homeland with little expansion and help the weak Ming dynasty survived, they would still have their own country.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Ace High's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trien Chieu View Post
    I know this is out of topic but I wonder whether conquering the whole China, Qinghai, Xinjiang, Mongolia and Tibet a big mistake by the Manchu? Logically, if you conquer a land with much much higher population than your, you will eventually lose in the end. If the Manchu didn't over expand themselves but stick to their homeland with little expansion and help the weak Ming dynasty survived, they would still have their own country.
    It's just the dynastic cycle making a full round again.
    You plant a garden and the flowers do not bloom, you poke a stick in the mud and it grows into a tree

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-03-13, 06:20 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-03-13, 02:49 PM
  3. Would Obai have sided with K'ang Hsi, or Ng 3 Gwai?
    By Ken Cheng in forum Wuxia Fiction
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-04-11, 05:14 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-13-09, 03:29 PM
  5. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-10-04, 05:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •