The DFBB = Great? thread got me thinking of using Xiao Feng vs MRF/YTZ as a basis of judging DFBB.
Xiao Feng vs MRF+YTZ = rough draw (but I think XF would win
eventually, I mean can you even imagine these 2 losers beating the incomparable Xiao Feng??)
DFBB vs RWX + LHC + XWT + RYY = relatively easy win for DFBB if not for unfair distraction.
Lets kick out XWT and RYY to make things simpler. Now surely DFBB can kick just RWX and LHC?
Now if we compare RWX and YTZ, surely RWX is a better all rounded fighter then YTZ? YTZ would have better energy but RWX is a skilled all round fighter and kung fu genius. YTZ is very strong if you don't realise his weakness and clash head on palms with him, but once you know his weakness he should be easy to KO.
LHC vs MRF is an interesting one, the man of many techniques vs the man who defeats techniques without one. The star shifter vs dugu 9 swords should be a most interesting sight! Can you defeat a fighter who overcomes techniques with no technique by using a technique that copies and redirects his skill?
I suppose that one could argue that MRF can copy LHC's DG9J all he wants but he would always be one move behind LHC since he has to copy/re-direct after LHC executes but LHC can change to another attack while MRF is executing his Star Shifter. I don't have that high an opinion of LHC and I do think MRF is quite good even by DGSD standards. But LHC's DG9J seems to be a nice technique to beat MRF with.
Now toss in XWT and even RYY and DFBB is starting to look pretty powerful right?
OK I know some would say that LHC beating MRF doesn't mean the same thing when fighting XF or DFBB but I am just generalising.