Here's the point.Originally Posted by ChronoReverse
The key is not whether GJ is responsible for or how much he is responsible for those civilians' deaths, the key is that he immersed himself in the war and thus involved innocent people in his quest for vengence. Is that really better than what YG tried to do against GJ? Think about it, clearly if GJ could get his hands on WYHL privately he wouldn't necessarily participate in the war, but if YG could take out GJ face to face, he wouldn't have had to resort to the underhanded ambush that he was planning. Basically, both men seeked vengeance in spite of obvious collateral damage potential.
I do NOT have any problems with GJ killing people or leading armies to kill people for vengeance. I am not someone who's always preaching or praising "morality." What I have a problem with is hypocrisy. Namely, people who knock YG for losing sight of the big picture because of thirst for revenge but who has no problem with GJ doing the same thing. Or perhaps because the people that the Mongols ran over in LOCH aren't Han, it's ok?