Oh, I've disagreed with a lot of Opposition decisions and statements too, and will continue to do so in matter that I feel are wrong too. I also despise several Opposition leaders.
I'm also someone who reads the Star and New Straits Times, although I've never read any of the four papers you mention.
Unlike you, though, I've not been following this case much at all. It's a case of "let me know if anything juicy happens and anyone high up gets implicated/charged".
Inquest verdict: Open verdict.
According to The Star twitter
Court in session now
Lawyer Tan Hock Chuan addressing court now
Selangor MB Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim arrives
Coroner: I thank the lawyers (naming each one). I've prepared written verdict, will distribute copies to family, state, parties who want it
Coroner Azmil: Thru out the days of inquest, we've called 37 witnesses including 12 expert witnesses
Azmil: Must bear in mind that in an inquest, there is no enactment, no prosecution, no defence, no trial, simply trying to establish facts.
Pin drop silence in courtroom. Everyone appears tensed. Only coroner reading his written verdict
Azmil now going through facts of the case, how the MACC was investigating a case of misuse of funds and how it led them to Ean Yong's office
Coroner established time of death as between 7.15am and 11.15am on July 16, 2009
Coroner: Now I go to the most important question. How and in what manner did the deceased die?
Coroner: The neck injury and the suicide note are the crucial evidence
Coroner: Two theories of cause of death advanced - death by homicide n death by suicide
Coroner: Handwriting of the suicide note was only similar to the deceased's
Coroner: I'm not qualified to say it's a suicide note
Coroner: I rule out death of the deceased by committing suicide
Coroner said there were "unsettled issues" in the question of suicide
Teoh Inquest: It’s not suicide, coroner says http://bit.ly/ftNAAh
Coroner: I return an open verdict in the inquest
Coroner delivered the open verdict after also ruling out death by homicide.
什麼是朋友?朋友永遠是在你犯下不可原諒錯誤的時候,仍舊站在你那邊的笨蛋。~ 王亞瑟
和諧唔係一百個人講同一番話,係一百個人有一百句唔同嘅說話,而又互相尊重 ~ - 葉梓恩
There are lots of things on this case that is just plain funny. Things like the prosecutor/attorney from MACC suggesting that Teoh strangled himself was on youtube for a while. Then there is also the translator who used Google to translate for MACC (so much money and staff and still no one who can read chinese).
Or the fact that MACC allows people to wonder around their building unescorted in the middle of the night. This despite them being an agency who was very insistent that any reports lodged with them are to be strictly confidential.
Ace_High: To say that MACC (and also the previous incarnation ACA) is fair in their investigations seems a stretch too far for me.
What happened (if anything) to the issue of a politician in Malacca/N9 (dunno which) sending millions out of the country a couple of years ago?
What about Muhammad Muhammad Taib (Selangor ex-MB who doesn't speak English)? Was any investigation done on his 4 million that he brought into Aussie?
And isn't money politics an offence? Why is it that Isa Samad who was suspended by UMNO for money politics not even investigated?