Follow me through this interesting imaginative exercise concerning three different criminal personalities and the relative threat that each poses to law-abiding people.
Three criminals go to rob a bank together. The robbery is botched, and the three criminals take the people in the bank (both employees and customers alike) hostage, whom they threaten to kill unless the authorities agree to give the robbers amnesty and safe passage.
Here is a description of each criminal's personality:
A). Criminal A is the mastermind behind the robbery. He is a schemer and planner, and the most level-headed and even-tempered of the three. He is not a cruel man, and he doesn't really want to hurt anyone. Nevertheless, he is prepared to do whatever is necessary so that he and his cohorts can escape alive and avoid going to prison.
B). Criminal B is inexperienced in crime. He is jumpy and nervous, and when frightened, he loses control of his temper and will shoot indiscriminately at what he perceives to be the source of his frustration (or, if he can't really identify the source, will lash out randomly). In spite of this, he is not really a cruel person and doesn't want to hurt anyone. He's scared, however, and his reaction to fear is to lash out randomly and violently with no sense of restraint.
C). Criminal C is the most aggressive and brutal of the three criminals. He is utterly ruthless and prepared to kill without the slightest hesitation anyone he believes is obstructing his path to safety and freedom. He uses aggression and fear to get what he wants. That said, he's not jumpy and nervous like Criminal B. He won't shoot randomly just to vent, and he's in control of his actions and emotions.
Question: which of the three criminals poses the greatest threat to the hostages? Who is the most dangerous of the three?