After everyone has given their opinions, impressions, expressions on this particular matter.
The question that lies here: is the LDA and LDS theory a reliable criterion for saying the LOCH trilogy top are below the DGSD top?
It isn't, the gentle talking isn't a reliable criterion either. But for both theories something can be said.
I think Tigerwong and Laviathan have a point when they are saying LDA and LDS are essentially the same thing. But LDA is a bit stronger form of LDS and LDS just a bit weaker than LDA.
It surprises me that no one till now has ever replied to me saying that one of the reasons why the belief DGSD top better than LOCH trilogy top was due top the style of writing of Jin Yong.
As for Guo Xiang no one knew for sure how strong she became. It's very premature to say that she doesn't belong to any top in any era.
Anyway I won't sue anyone mainly because I don't have enough money to hire a top lawyer. Secondly no court will take this case seriously. Sueing another reader for having different opinions about characters of a novel. Right I can see it now in the headlines on CNN.
<IMG SRC="smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0">