It is only said that YG's roar covered up the sounds of the battle crys of the soldiers. When you say "blasted away", I was thinking more of a bazooka blasting away at the soldiers. I suppose that was just a misunderstanding of communication .
Sorry, I use an online text source, which may be outdated and error prone. I cannot find any instance where GJ jabbed 14 taoist's wrists with ONE stance. I am much too lazy to dig back on every single post on this thread. Would you mind pointing the source our for me? Thanks.Originally Posted by Snafu3721
Though, to add on, I would like to point out that GJ did not defeat ALL 98 taoists. After wrecking the formation, he ran away.
This has nothing to do with whether the Great would have an easier time fighting 98 taoists or 98 soldiers, but rather comparing a Great performance against 98 taoists makes no defining implications upon how Great-leveled fighters will fare against an army because of the various differences I have listed in my previous posts (mainly difference in numbers, attitude, and purpose). For example, GJ can use one palm to defend against 49 taoists because they linked into ONE person, but there is not way GJ can use ONE palm to defend against 49 soldiers. I cannot prove whether it was easier to use one palm to defend against 49 taoists or whether it will be easier to seperately defend against 49 soldiers. However, I CAN say that the two processes will be inherently different. One is dependent upon power/strength while the other is dependent upon speed. Likewise, fighting against 100 taoists will be inherently differently from fighting an army. Thus, the two cannot be compared equally and one case cannot be a useful predicament of the other.
I don't remember how the movie Hero went. also, I'm not quite sure you can equate the novel GJ to a movie Jet Li...Originally Posted by Snafu3721
Though based on pure geometry, a person roughly 6 surface plane: Top, bottom, right, left, front, back. Usually only the bottom is protected by the ground. If GJ is suspended in the air next to the wall, I imagine very few arrows will be comming from the top side and none will be comming from the side behind (the wall). Also, i doubt there will be much arrows comming from the left & right side because the soldiers are still charging towards the wall. In order to hit the sides, the archers will have to be aiming from the left or right side. Since they are still charging and archers are not usually at the forefront, I doubt there would be many archers on the left & right side. This also means there would be less arrows comming from teh bottom side since that would require archers to be almost directly beneath him. Thus, the only side that GJ really needed to defend against is the front. Therefore, it is possible that the giant cloth/sheild method can only work in one direction. Now, if we had GJ on the surrounded on the ground, he would now be open on 4 sides: Front, back, left, & right. With two shields/cloths, he can only securely defend against 2 sides, leaving two sides open--thus vulnerable.
As for XF, XZ, DY, I have seen no evidence that they can deflect arrows with a palm wind barrer.
Now, before you fall asleep from reading my tedious and long-winded explainations, let's cut to the REAL point. Am I claiming that the senerio I created must be true and that the Jet Li/Hero senerio must be false? Certainly NOT! But...can you PROVE that the senerio I created is certianly false and that your Jet Li/Hero senerio is true? I highly doubt it, too.
The senerio I proposed is only as likely as the Jet Li/Hero and XF/XZ/DY Palm Wind senerio you proposed. Neither is necessarily true or false. So what is my point? It's not to make you fall asleep and too tired to respond, but rather that there is no sufficient proof that arrows are useless against Greats (or that Greats can defeat armies for that matter). Without such proof, there is no solid contradiction against what Jin Yong wrote about arrows, armies, and Greats, and thus such statements should not be randomly disgarded as Jin Yong is "bullsh*tting".
One is allowed to believe whatevers one likes as most of this is pretty much based on opinions, but I personality believe one shouldn't use such "evidences" as "PROOF" in an argument or simply discard someone else's argument by simply stating "JY is bullsh*tting" as a COUNTER.