Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: "Wulin" in Jin Yong's Qing Dynasty-era stories.

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Giang Ho, Canada
    Posts
    4,876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Cheng View Post
    This pertains to all forms of governments, including democratic republics that go bad.
    Hopefully, Canada and US are the exception. We are lucky that we live on a big piece of fertile land with vast natural resources and oceans on both east and west. If you compare it to other parts of the world, we are in the best position
    Last edited by Trien Chieu; 11-10-15 at 05:56 PM.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trien Chieu View Post
    Yes. They did. The problem with dynasty is that they won't last. Eventually, the dynasty will end up with a few useless emperors in a row that will lead it to collapse.
    The Qing dynasty is shorter than the Tang dynasty by just 22 years. If the Qing dynasty was a short lived failure, so was the Tang dynasty. Qing began with 150+ years of stability and good governance. Name another dynasty that can match this record.

  3. #23
    Senior Member PJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    18,425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Liew View Post
    A Deadly Secret never did feel like a Qing story to me. The feel was very much in the Ming or Song dynasty kind of wulin. Many of us felt that it was a Ming dynasty story despite the art in the storybook, so much that Jin Yong had to clarify and explicitly state that it was set in the Qing. That kind of removed a lot of the romance of the setting for me, but plot-wise it still doesn't feel like the Qing.
    Correct. In the 2nd ed, there were only a few brief mentions of government (Ling Tuisi is the only example I can think of), which were just to acknowledge that yes, there was a government. None of the rebel stuff. So yes, it could have very well been Ming dynasty just going by the "feel".
    忽见柳荫下两个小孩子在哀哀痛哭,瞧模样正是武敦儒、武修文兄弟。郭芙大声叫道:「喂,你们在干甚麽?」武 修文回头见是郭芙,哭道:「我们在哭,你不见麽?」

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Giang Ho, Canada
    Posts
    4,876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pannonian View Post
    The Qing dynasty is shorter than the Tang dynasty by just 22 years. If the Qing dynasty was a short lived failure, so was the Tang dynasty. Qing began with 150+ years of stability and good governance. Name another dynasty that can match this record.
    The Tang Dynasty was stable from the beginning until the late reign of Emperor Xuanzong (618 to 755) which is about 137 years. If you look at history, pretty much all dynasties failed, not just Chinese dynasties. As usually, the first few emperors of most dynasties are great. They are intelligent and work hard to make the dynasty stronger. However, the later on emperors are into hedonism and immortality which lead the dynasty to collapse. Regarding Qing Dynasty, if the emperor Guangxi was able to reform, the dynasty might not collapse. However, he failed.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-11-11, 03:41 PM
  2. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-18-09, 08:05 AM
  3. Comparing Jin Yong's Qing-dynasty era stories
    By Tom in forum Wuxia Fiction
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-05-08, 01:17 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-12-07, 09:08 PM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-26-06, 06:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •